Sunday 26 September 2010

Watchman, what of the night?

‘Watchman, what of the night? Watchman, what of the night?’

In these solemn days when the bands of Secular Humanism and Atheism have joined forces to destroy evangelical Protestantism, these words from Isaiah21:11 are particularly poignant. GB has become the hub of the global secularist movement; there is a systematic rejection of the authority of God’s infallible Word and a dangerous dependence on human reasoning. The secularist movement is said to have been the engine of ‘new labour’; certainly over the past few years secular humanism has gained great prominence politically and also in the media.

Against the backdrop of atheism, the religion of foolishness, secular humanism has found fertile soil in which to cultivate its pragmatic plants; when the existence of God is questioned, then secular humanism comes into its own; take God out of the equation and humanism begins to promote its religion of selfishness. While atheism is busy using evolution to throw God out of science and society; humanism is busy using secularism to establish man’s authority as predominant.

In recent times, the spiritual darkness, generated by atheistic secular humanism, that has started to settle on mainland GB, has begun to drift over the province of Ulster. Ulster has had the privilege of being the last bastion of evangelical Protestantism left in the UK, that is, until the dark shadows of error began to gather.

There were many political initiatives tried in Ulster over the years, to bring an end to sectarian violence and to end the ever spiralling cost of death and devastation. More recently, the Westminster and Dublin governments drew up a plan whereby the conflict in Ulster would cease; the first blue print was released as the ‘Good Friday’ or the ‘Belfast’ agreement. This agreement was top heavy with secular humanist philosophy and dangerously low on foundational Scriptural and Biblical principle and was met with limited success.

However, when the Belfast agreement was subjected to a little more secular air brushing at St Andrews, it became acceptable to the leader of Ulster evangelical protestants, Rev Ian Paisley. ‘Watchman, what of the night?’ Mr Paisley signed up to the agreement which is based upon secular humanist principles, and then took his seat with unrepentant terrorists in government. The present political settlement in Ulster has put the pragmatism of secular humanism above the principles of, truth, justice, holiness, mercy, charity, faith and love which are pillars upon which evangelical Protestantism stand; all this happened on the watch of Rev Ian Paisley. ‘Watchman, what of the night?’

What is more astounding is that the Free Presbyterian Church of Ulster fully supports such a government and refuses to censor its ministers and office bearers who helped to implement it. Its’ all very well to protest against the leader of the nominal Christian rump, the Pope, but not a word of condemnation on those that advocate a political settlement based on secular humanistic ideals. ‘Watchman, what of the night?’

The night of atheistic secular humanism is advancing rapidly, obscuring the One that is ‘the way the truth and the life’ God has said; ‘I have set watchmen upon thy walls, O Jerusalem, which shall never hold their peace day nor night: ye that make mention of the LORD, keep not silence, And give him no rest, till he establish, and till he make Jerusalem a praise in the earth.’ (Isa62:6-7) ‘Watchman, what of the night?’


Rev Mervyn Cotton (Heb13:6)

2 comments:

  1. One has to question the moral authority of the FPC, whose Morals and Standards Committee was quick to condemn line dancing as sinful,
    but at the same time, are loathe to condemn the present power-sharing terrorist-inclusive gov't facilitated by their then Moderator, Ian Paisley.

    Source: BBC News
    Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/news/vote2001/hi/english/northern_ireland/newsid_1337000/1337473.stm
    18 May, 2001 / Paisley brands line dancing 'sinful'

    “The leader of the DUP, Ian Paisley, has said line dancing is sinful.
    However, Reverend David McIlveen of the Free Presbyterian Church's Morals and Standards Committee said dancing was not in line with the church's teaching.

    "Well as far as we are concerned, we feel that dancing in any shape or form is incompatible with a Christian profession," said Mr McIlveen.

    Mr Paisley addressing his congregation
    "We were mainly concerned about couples coming to our Church to get married who bring a very strong and a very sincere testimony of their saving faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.
    "They could well go to a reception which included some form of dancing as part of that reception.
    "We felt as a church that this was inconsistent with regard to their own personal testimony which was confirmed and spoken about in the Church," he added.”
    *******
    Yet they fail to see the glaring inconsistency of Ian Paisley's actions in this grave matter, and have thus demonstrated their lack of judgment by their "respect of persons". (Deut. 1:17; Prov. 24:23)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rev. Cotton,

    Upon further reflection upon your post, I would add that that once again you have rightly assessed these solemn matters, by revealing what lies at the very heart of the controversy. Namely, that Ian Paisley, a professing Christian, an avowed Gospel Minister and Servant of the Lord, was party to bringing about an ungodly alliance that includes those with undeniable links to terrorism, those whom he has consistently affirmed were unfit for government on that account. To elevate, promote and embrace such as Ivan Foster, retired FPC Minister, has described thus:
    *“gangsters and Mafia-like figures being elevated to government, men whose hands are stained with the blood of victims of terrorism.”
    is both Christ-dishonouring and Christ-insulting and violates the solemn vow that Ian Paisley has taken to “stand for all that Christ is for, and all that He is against.”

    *source: The Times / March 24, 2007 / Prophet or king? Big Man decides
    Link: http://times.cluster.newsint.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1560477.ece?print=yes&randnum=1151003209000

    Sadly, many in the church, have been carried away by Paisley's dissimulating spirit, and the situational ethics theology (the end justifies the means) and worldly mindset that guided those who formulated the peace process in N.I.
    Though your public rebuke of him has largely been met with scorn by so-called professing Christians in this land, it is true and faithful. Like Paul who withstood Peter because he was to be blamed, to your credit you have withstood Ian Paisley.
    In so doing, you have given every evidence that you seek not to please men, but God.
    “For do I now persuade men, or God? Or do I seek to please men? For if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.”
    Gal. 1:10

    Ian Paisley, the preacher, would do well to revisit a sermon he preached in 1974 entitled 'Beware of the Old Prophet of Bethel', and prayerfully consider the following words taken from that sermon in the context of his meeting in 2006 with then Archbishop Brady.
    ****
    THE DECEIVER

    That old apostate in I Kings chapter thirteen tried to link himself up with the man of God. He said to him "I am like you. I am in the same business as you. I am a preacher like you. You just come back with me." What did the man of God do? He disobeyed God's command.

    The saddest thing you can do is to disobey God and put yourself outside God's blessing. I must be careful that I obey the Lord no matter who I offend. I have offended thousands of people in my ministry, and I will probably offend a few people here this morning. It will not worry me, I will eat a good dinner when [16] I go home. I must not disobey God. It must not be done.

    HE RETRACED HIS STEPS

    The man of God out of Judah returned again. He retraced his steps. There is nothing so sad as to see a preacher or a church retracing its steps. Once it stood for God but now it is weakened. Once it would not tolerate worldliness but now it has weakened. Once it insisted on separation but now it has compromised. There is nothing as sad as that! The man of God turned again. When I studied this chapter I discovered that he failed in the very place he should have triumphed.
    ****
    The full transcript of Ian Paisley's sermon Beware of the Old Prophet of Bethel
    can be accessed here:
    Source: The Revivalist – Oct. 1974
    Link: http://www.ianpaisley.org/revivalist/1974/Rev74oct.htm

    Rev. Cotton,

    May God be pleased to strengthen you to boldly declare all that He hath laid upon your heart, and along with that, grant unto you fresh encouragement and expressions of his lovingkindness and mercy, even as He hath promised, to those who walk uprightly!
    (Ps. 84:11)

    In Christian solidarity,

    June / Ask Dr. Paisley

    ReplyDelete